So, You Want to Understand Heidegger?
Here’s a brief reading list, from the more introductory to the more difficult, for those who want to understand Heidegger better. First, though, you might ask yourself, “Why should I study Heidegger?” Here is a list of reasons that stand out in my mind (and I’m sure more could be given):
- Heidegger stands among the most prominent and important 20th century philosophers (often coupled with Wittgenstein).
- Heidegger has influenced many prominent thinkers in various fields:
- Psychology—Karl Jaspers, Jean-Paul Sartre, R.D. Laing, Rollo May, Medard Boss.
- Philosophy—Richard Rorty, Michel Foucault, Emmanuel Levinas.
- Hermeneutics—Rudolf Bultmann, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Jacques Derrida, Paul Ricoeur, Jürgen Habermas.
- Political Theory—Leo Strauss, Hannah Arendt.
- Anthropology—Clifford Geertz, Tim Ingold.
- Theology—Paul Tillich, Jean-Luc Marion, John D. Caputo.
- Heidegger is a major figure in the phenomenological/humanistic tradition, which has had a profound effect on modern culture.
- Heidegger’s thought, though difficult, is rewarding.
With that in mind, here is my list of secondary works for those who are interested in learning about Martin Heidegger’s thought, placing them in preferred reading order:
- Inwood, Michael, Heidegger: A Very Short Introduction (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).
- Polt, Richard, Heidegger: An Introduction (New York: Cornell University Press, 1999).
- Mulhall, Stephen, Heidegger and Being and Time (New York: Routledge, 1996).
- Dreyfus, Hubert L., Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1991).
- Wrathall, Mark, How to Read Heidegger (W.W. Norton, 2006).
- Pattison, George, Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to the Later Heidegger (New York: Routledge, 2000).
- Young, Julian, Heidegger’s Later Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
- Richardson, William J., Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought (New York: Fordham University Press, 2003).
- Heidegger, Martin, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Albert Hofstadter, trans. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982).
- ..., Being and Time, John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, trans. (New York: Harper & Row, 1962).
- Krell, David Farrell, ed., Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings (New York: HarperCollins, 1993).
- Heidegger, Martin, The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, William McNeill and Nicholas Walker, trans. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995).
- Lovitt, William, ed. and trans., The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays (New York: Harper & Row, 1977).
- Hofstadter, Albert, trans., Poetry, Language, Thought (New York: Harper & Row, 1971).
- Heidegger, Martin, Introduction to Metaphysics, Gregory Fried and Richard Polt, trans. (New Haven, CN: Yale University Press, 2000).
P.S. If anyone has any suggestions, corrections, or comments on this list either in terms of content or order, please let me know.
Labels: Intro to Heidegger
11 Comments:
I really liked Heidegger's Analytic and I think Through Phenomenology to Thought is a must read.
Clark, where do you think they should be in relation to what I've given? Which would you give priority? Got limited space, so trying to be somewhat selective.
Oh, two others. I don't think one can understand Heidegger without seeing his connection to Husserl and other phenomenologists. So I think for beginners Dermot Moran's Introduction to Phenomenology is a must. I think a bit of knowledge of Kierkegaard, Hegel and Kant is helpful as well. As is Aristotle. Although I don't think one has to know a lot.
I think Richardson just has to be in there. One could probably do without Heidegger's Analytic. I should add that I think one could do without the Routledge guide to the latter Heidegger as well. It's good, but I think Richardson is much better.
BTW I think in Heidegger's own works that for his middle period one probably should read his work on Kant and then his work on Leibniz. (The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic is, in my mind, one of the more important works from his middle period even though it covers roughly the same ground as Being and Time) For the latter period I think Introduction to Metaphysics is pretty important.
Ok, I'll see what I can do to include it and update the entry.
Clark, I've updated the list. I decided not to include The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic and Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics for brevity's sake, but heartily endorse them for any reader. What I've provided should be good for a thorough introduction to Heidegger's thought; more would seem to be overkill for that purpose, though certainly suggested for further study.
Don't forget to read up Heidegger's two influences: Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. I especially recommend "The Present Age" and "The Sickness Unto Death" by Kierkegaard.
I'm supposed to do a defense on Heidegger and his thoughts on existentialism but from all these philosophers I've studied on, he has this deep explanation on Being which I find so hard to comprehend. What's a good site to check on this? Thanks!!
anonymous,
Beyond what I've posted here (see particularly here, here, and here), you will want to read Heidegger's Letter on "Humanism" (also found in Basic Writings). There he criticizes "existential" philosophy for still buying into the "metaphysical" distinction between essence and existence (with existentialism giving the latter primacy, as most dualities do privilege one above the other). He also emphasizes that man's being is intimately and essentially tied up with being/beings, rather than merely his possibilities that he is then supposed to "authentically" realize.
You might also want to check out On the Essence of Truth, particularly Heidegger's discussion of "freedom" not as caprice (as the "existentialists") often talk about it), but as freedom for beings/being which is the foundation for capricious freedom itself.
Let me know if you have any particular questions on either of those.
This is great. I'm going to check out some of these books and read more of your entries when I have time.
I'm a grad student in french lit and am planning on concentrating on the 20th century when I start my phd. They're offering a Heidegger class over in the philosophy dept in the university where I'm at next semester so I'm planning on taking it to help me with Derrida, Foucault, Blanchot, etc.. Although I've read a bit of philosophy on my own, I havent actually taken a philosophy class since my sophmore year of college, so I'm a little worried about getting over my head. So I've got whatever time I have on the side of my studies for the rest of this semester and then Christmas break to prepare myself. I got through Jonathan Rée's short 50 pager yesterday, and will next read the chapter on Heidegger in Andrew Bowie's Intro to German Philosophy, then I'll check out some of the books on your list.
A question that pops into my head is: Is it possible to approach his philosophy through English translations? Do you read him in German?
Herr Richter,
It is very possible to approach Heidegger in English translations. It is a common saying that Heidegger is just as hard for native speaking Germans as he is for native English speakers reading translations (though some who are capable of both prefer one over the other). See, for example, Thomas Sheehan's Let a Hundred Translations Bloom!: A Modest Proposal About Being and Time."
My German is currently so dismal that I can't simply read him in German. I do own a few of his German texts, however, and am trying to improve my German through them (a dangerous task, given his creative use of German terms). I am trying to start a few interlinear Heidegger texts that, sometime in the next few years, I hope to submit to a publisher (though I really need to get something of a name for myself before they'd even consider it; then there are also copyright issues). The short of it: I'm still a novice in German, but it is fun trying to read Heidegger in German. ;o)
I've started a series of summaries on Being and Time that you will probably find useful (see here and here). I've found them very useful as doing a summary requires a very close reading. I hope some of the other entries on my blog will prove useful as well. If you ever have any questions, feel free to email me or post them here.
Post a Comment
<< Home